In a New Jersey case where the parties’ agreement calls for them to “equally divide…school costs,” and one party does not contribute to the costs for years, even though not explicitly asked to do so, a court can enforce the agreement and compel contribution. In the unpublished Appellate Division case of Fanelli v. Hnatowski, the court held that great deference must be afforded to parties’ agreements. The terms of the agreement must be enforced when the terms of the agreement are clear.
The court held that “school costs” as defined in the agreement included private school. Defendant’s failure to object to the children’s attendance in private school over nine years operated as implicit consent. In this application, Plaintiff did not seek reimbursement for 50% of the private school costs for the nine-year period during which Defendant failed to contribute. However, Plaintiff did seek 50% of the tuition and costs moving forward. The court granted the application and ordered enforcement of the agreement and an equal contribution to private school.
The strong public policy in New Jersey is to enforce agreements. As one of our courts primary concerns is to protect our children, they often err on the side of protecting children’s financial interests.
The Super Lawyers List is issued by Thompson Reuters. A description of the selection methodology can be found here. Visit here for the selection methodology for Best Lawyers. A description of the Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent® status selection methodology can be found here. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.