Blog

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: How Does it Impact Divorce?

 

The recent Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017, by President Donald J. Trump.  The Act leaves family lawyers eager to understand its implications in preparation for an overwhelming number of questions from clients. The Act repeals the deduction for the alimony payments and their inclusion as income to the alimony recipient. However, to give taxpayers time to adjust to this change, this new law will apply only to divorce or separation instruments recorded after December 31, 2018.

Originally, the law was to take into effect after December 31, 2017.  There was a mass frenzy to finalize divorce agreements so to take advantage of the taxability and deductibility of alimony. Now we have one year to figure out the long- and short-term implications of this new law.  There will be many areas where this change will impact pending divorces and also those already concluded. Most significantly, of course, will be the issue of alimony and how this will be calculated.  Considering the similarly to child support, it will no longer have a tax consequence.

Our Child Support Guidelines take into consideration that alimony is both taxable and deductible, so they will need to be updated.  Child support may also be impacted. Other agreements or settlement instruments may have specifically taken into consideration the benefit of the tax deductibility, and this may provide a basis to review the terms of a prior agreement on a more global scale.

Without doubt, the impact of this new law will be broad.  Please contact me at jlawrence@lawlawfirm.com if you have questions about Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or any other family law matter.

Subscribe to Our Blog

SHARE THIS POST:

Related Posts

Blog
Equitable Distribution of Negative Equity

  The factors that must be considered by the court for purposes of determining equitable distribution of assets and debts acquired during marriage are identified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Items included for purposes of equitable distribution are: marital properties vehicles bank accounts stock options retirement accounts mortgages credit card debts automobile loans any other assets and…

Read More
Blog
Extreme Higher Earning Parent – No Increase in Support

  Child Support with an Extreme Higher Earning Parent – In a recent New Jersey appellate division case of Ianniello v. Pizzo, the appellate division upheld the trial court’s denial of the custodial parent’s request to increase child support.  The non-custodial parent was paying $10,000 per month.  The custodial parent sought a $65,000 per month…

Read More
Blog
A Final Restraining Order Does Not Have to be Forever

  In a recent post, I wrote about the best ways to defend against a Final Restraining Order (FRO). However, unfortunately, it is not always possible to successfully defend against the entry of an FRO.  Therefore, defendants need to know the serious consequences associated with an FRO.  They also need to understand that “final” does…

Read More
Blog
Restraining Order Violations are Serious Crimes

  A restraining order is a powerful tool to protect victims of domestic violence.  The purpose of a restraining order is to avoid future communication or contact between two people.  This holds true for as long as the order remains active. A person who makes contact will be held in contempt of the restraining order. …

Read More
Blog
Domestic Violence – Defending Final Restraining Orders

  Domestic violence is a pervasive problem throughout the United States. The State of New Jersey is no exception to this ongoing dilemma. Accordingly, the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (“the Act”) has been enacted and is intended to act as a shield for domestic violence victims. Unfortunately, there are times where matrimonial litigants instead…

Read More
Blog
A Penalty Provision in the Marital Settlement Agreement

  In New Jersey divorces, marital settlement agreements include language that addresses the ramifications if either person breaches any provision of the agreement.  Often, the agreement includes a penalty provision that requires breaching party to pay the other’s counsel fees if the matter requires court intervention.  More often than not, courts have largely ignored such…

Read More
Call Now ButtonCall Us