Blog

Equitable Distribution of Negative Equity

 

The factors that must be considered by the court for purposes of determining equitable distribution of assets and debts acquired during marriage are identified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.

Items included for purposes of equitable distribution are:

  • marital properties
  • vehicles
  • bank accounts
  • stock options
  • retirement accounts
  • mortgages
  • credit card debts
  • automobile loans
  • any other assets and debts obtained or incurred by the parties during the marriage.

An interesting issue arises, however, when one party seeks to retain a marital asset that is underwater. Presented another way, how do courts determine equitable distribution of negative equity, whether a residence, automobile, or the like? In a recent unpublished opinion, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court upheld the lower court’s equal allocation of negative equity between two parties.  The trial court determination that negative equity of a marital property is a joint marital liability subject to equitable distribution.

In affirming, in part, the trial court’s decision, the Appellate Division calculated each party’s share of equitable distribution by adding the “net value of all properties and businesses, and divid[ing] that amount in half…”. It then subtracted $100,000 from the wife’s share of the negative equity in a marital timeshare whose mortgage exceeded its value by more than $200,000. In justifying this calculation of negative equity, the Appellate Division relied on the fact the wife asserted no objection in calculating the equity of other marital property by “subtracting the amount of the outstanding mortgage from the value of the property,” and that the only difference in doing so with respect to the marital timeshare versus other marital property, is that the timeshare was encumbered by more debt than its appraised value. With this reasoning, the lower court’s decision on this issue was affirmed.

The Florida Case

Since the Appellate Division’s opinion is unpublished, it does not establish precedent in New Jersey.  However, it is worth noting that the District Court of Appeal in Florida reached a similar conclusion regarding the disposition of negative equity.   In so deciding, the Florida court opined that the trial court “erroneously assumed that the negative value associated with the [parties’] condominium would simply vanish if the parties were to ‘abandon the residence’ or ‘return the keys to the banks holding the indebtedness.” The Florida court additionally relied upon the fact that debtors remain liable for any debt that is not satisfied following foreclosure proceedings. As such, the lower court had to consider the condo’s negative equity as a joint marital liability for equitable distribution.

This Florida court’s principle would appear consistent with the New Jersey Appellate Division decision. This suggests that a determination as to negative equity in New Jersey is similarly subject to the state’s statutory factors.

Please contact me at jlawrence@lawlawfirm.com if you have questions about this post or any other family law matter.

Back to Blog
SHARE THIS POST:

Related Posts

Blog
Divorce and executive compensation

How Executive Compensation Complicates Divorce Settlements During a recent survey, more than 35% of divorcees cited finances as the primary friction point in the marriage. The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers further found that divorce rates are higher among high earners than the average American and that divorce rates actually rise during periods of economic…

Read More
Blog
How to Address Power Imbalances in Family Law Mediation and Arbitration

Dealing With Power Imbalances in Family Law Disputes In New Jersey and throughout the nation, many family lawyers prefer mediation over litigation as a means to resolve family law disputes. Negotiated agreements allow for self-determination, and statistics show that mediated agreements are less expensive than litigation, much more likely to satisfy both parties’ disputes and…

Read More
Blog
Leaving An Abusive Relationship

Steps to Take When Leaving an Abusive Relationship Some studies have shown that intimate partner violence (IPV) accounts for more than 15% of all violent crime in the United States. IPV is not limited to physical abuse but extends to psychological, sexual, and financial harm as well. Leaving the relationship is the best solution for…

Read More
Blog
With NJ Courts Closed Can I Still Get A Divorce?

With Trials Suspended, Can You Still Get Divorced? Almost 30% of judicial positions are currently unfilled in two multi-county court jurisdictions in New Jersey: Vicinage 13 and 15. These vacancies have left the courts overwhelmed, and the fears of local divorce attorneys have come to pass as the courts have opted to suspend divorce and…

Read More
Blog
Dissipation of assets by your estranged spouse

Protecting Yourself From Asset Dissipation During a Divorce New Jersey divorce attorneys note that some level of marital asset dissipation occurs in a majority of divorces. While this is in some cases a serious offense that a judge will consider, experts recommend taking measures to protect your financial interests. The most important reason to take…

Read More
Blog
Stonewalling can destroy a marriage

How Stonewalling Can Ruin Your Marriage The concept of stonewalling in marriages and other relationships is certainly not new, but it has recently begun to receive greater emphasis from family law attorneys, relationship therapists, and other professionals who focus on marriage and divorce. In fact, the Gottman Method of Relationship Therapy considers it one of…

Read More

Disclaimer and information can be found here, including links to descriptions and selection methodologies. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.