Jeralyn Lawrence, Esq. Makes her Third Supreme Court Appearance on Behalf of NJSBA


Jeralyn Lawrence appearing before the Supreme Court of New Jersey, Supreme Court case Cardali v. CardaliJeralyn Lawrence, Esq. made her third appearance before the New Jersey Supreme Court. Her argument in the Cardali v. Cardali case on behalf of the NJSBA focused on the need for clarity and uniformity in how requests for modification of alimony based on cohabitation are addressed by the courts. This case is particularly important because it will impact how courts throughout the state handle similar cases in the future.

The Cardali v. Cardali case is an important one, involving the sensitive issue of alimony modification based on cohabitation. Jeralyn argued that there needs to be clear guidelines and consistency in how these cases are handled by the courts. This will not only benefit the parties involved in the Cardali case but also other individuals who may face similar circumstances in the future. Jeralyn’s argument before the Supreme Court highlights the importance of having an experienced and knowledgeable legal professional advocating for one’s rights and interests.

The Suzanne Cardali v. Michael Cardali Argument can be found here.

Back to News

Related Posts

Today’s Insights from the Cardali v. Cardali Decision: Analyzing Cohabitation Presentation in Alimony

  Today, the New Jersey Supreme Court made abundantly clear what evidence is required, and when it is required, regarding cohabitation in applications seeking to suspend, modify or terminate alimony.  In Cardali, the New Jersey Supreme Court has provided clarity and guidance as to what is required at the initial motion stage and then at…

Read More
‘Temple’ of Doom: The Prima Facie Showing of Cohabitation Remains a Mystery

‘Temple’ of Doom: The Prima Facie Showing of Cohabitation Remains a Mystery, by Matheu D. Nunn, Jeralyn L. Lawrence, Carolyn N. Daly, Sheryl J. Seiden, Debra S. Weisberg, and Robin C. Bogan The Family Bar shared a collective “sigh” of relief with publication of the ‘Temple’ decision. Read the article.

Read More

Disclaimer and information can be found here, including links to descriptions and selection methodologies. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.