Blog

The Law on Removing a Child from New Jersey

On August 8, 2017, the law governing a parent’s ability to move with their child out of New Jersey changed dramatically.

New Jersey joined 42 other states in our country that view this issue as one that focuses on the best interests of the child. This is a marked change from the previous law, which essentially presumed the custodial parent would be able to relocate with the child.

The social sciences underpinning the old law suggested that a happy custodial parent led to a happy child, so if the move made the custodial parent happy, then the child would be happy too. More recently, both studies and common sense have shown this is not the case when children have two active, involved, and loving parents.

Now, the law has shifted the focus to where it should be — on the child. Factors a court should consider in analyzing the best interest of a child when considering a parent’s request to move from New Jersey are the:

  • Parents’ ability to agree, communicate, and cooperate in matters relating to the child
  • Parents’ willingness to accept custody and any history of unwillingness to allow parenting time not based on substantiated abuse
  • Interaction and relationship of the child with its parents and siblings
  • History of domestic violence, if any
  • Safety of the child and the safety of either parent from physical abuse by the other parent
  • Preference of the child when of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent decision
  • Needs of the child
  • Stability of the home environment offered
  • Quality and continuity of the child’s education
  • Fitness of the parents
  • Geographical proximity of the parents’ homes
  • Extent and quality of the time spent with the child prior to or subsequent to the separation
  • Parents’ employment responsibilities
  • Age and number of the children

Additional factors, suggested for the court to consider are:

  • Reasons for seeking or opposing relocation
  • The right of the child separated from one parent to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis in a manner consistent with the child’s development, except if the contact is contrary to the child’s best interests
  • Pre-existing custody and parenting time determinations
  • History of the family and particularly the continuity and quality of past and current care and contact arrangements, including any prior relocation
  • Impact of granting or refusing the child’s relocation, paying particular attention to the child’s extended family, education, and social life
  • Nature of the inter-parental relationships and the commitment of the applicant to support and facilitate the child’s relationship with the stay-behind parent after relocation
  • Whether the parties’ proposals for parenting time after relocation are realistic, paying particular attention to the cost to the family and burden to the child
  • Enforceability of parenting time provisions ordered as conditions of relocation in the state of destination
  • Issues of mobility for family members, both seeking and opposing relocation
  • Economic impact of relocation on both parents
  • Any special medical, mental, or educational needs of the child and the likelihood that those needs can be met at the same or better level in the state of destination than in New Jersey
  • Other factors the court may deem relevant under the circumstances

When I served as Chair of the Family Law Section of the New Jersey State Bar Association, we studied this issue exhaustively and drafted a statute which incorporated this best interest standard, and it was slowly making its way through the legislature. Thankfully, the judiciary, specifically the New Jersey Supreme Court, acted first to address this very important issue.

Relocation/removal cases are some of the most difficult and heart-wrenching of all. This change in the law is welcome, and will hopefully reduce the strife and stress in children’s lives.

If you have any questions or concerns about this post or any other matrimonial or family law issue, please do not hesitate to me at jlawrence@lawlawfirm.com.

Subscribe to Our Blog

SHARE THIS POST:

Related Posts

Blog
Equitable Distribution of Negative Equity

  The factors that must be considered by the court for purposes of determining equitable distribution of assets and debts acquired during marriage are identified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Items included for purposes of equitable distribution are: marital properties vehicles bank accounts stock options retirement accounts mortgages credit card debts automobile loans any other assets and…

Read More
Blog
Extreme Higher Earning Parent – No Increase in Support

  Child Support with an Extreme Higher Earning Parent – In a recent New Jersey appellate division case of Ianniello v. Pizzo, the appellate division upheld the trial court’s denial of the custodial parent’s request to increase child support.  The non-custodial parent was paying $10,000 per month.  The custodial parent sought a $65,000 per month…

Read More
Blog
A Final Restraining Order Does Not Have to be Forever

  In a recent post, I wrote about the best ways to defend against a Final Restraining Order (FRO). However, unfortunately, it is not always possible to successfully defend against the entry of an FRO.  Therefore, defendants need to know the serious consequences associated with an FRO.  They also need to understand that “final” does…

Read More
Blog
Restraining Order Violations are Serious Crimes

  A restraining order is a powerful tool to protect victims of domestic violence.  The purpose of a restraining order is to avoid future communication or contact between two people.  This holds true for as long as the order remains active. A person who makes contact will be held in contempt of the restraining order. …

Read More
Blog
Domestic Violence – Defending Final Restraining Orders

  Domestic violence is a pervasive problem throughout the United States. The State of New Jersey is no exception to this ongoing dilemma. Accordingly, the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (“the Act”) has been enacted and is intended to act as a shield for domestic violence victims. Unfortunately, there are times where matrimonial litigants instead…

Read More
Blog
Legislative Impact on Family Law – A Sneak Peek

I knew I wanted to be a lawyer for as long as I can remember. My father is a retired juvenile detective from New Jersey.  I developed my love for the law through him. Law school proved challenging, requiring round-the-clock studying, but this diligence allowed me to graduate second in my class. Throughout law school and…

Read More
Call Now ButtonCall Us